User:Gja226/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.) Soil science

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because it goes into depth about soil science and the history and individuals associated with it. It matters because soil is hoe we grow food, and the more people who know more about soil, the better. My first impressions were that this article was well constructed, and read easily.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

-This article is a good and well constructed one. It has strong and clear introduction.

-The article has wide array of content ranging from areas of practice, history, mapping, field of study, research, and classification.

-It is easy to read with little to no grammar mistakes.

-It has proper sources and links to facts used in the article.

-It has a neutral tone, no bias opinions or takes in this article, nothing but the facts.

-The images used in the article are good and well captioned.

-The article however, does not seem to have an active talk page at the moment. The last comments was form 2019, fairly recent, but still some time ago.

- Overall, this article is a good and concise, I would say get more people to comment in the talk page, but other than that the strengths listed above are a good indicator for this article.