User:Gjcrew/Sea turtle/Soccerguym Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

I am reviewing Gwenyth Crew's work (Gjcrew). The following is the link to her work: (User:Gjcrew/Sea turtle)

Regarding the "lead" of the article, there is already a "Physiology" section in article (Sea turtle). The first sentence of the section the author is suggesting concisely describes the topic of the proposed section (she states that sensory cues for navigation change dramatically below a certain depth, then goes on to elaborate on why this is so). It is not overly detailed. The proposed content to be added is relevant to the topic. Most of the content is obtained from up-to-date sources (although there is one source from 2012). The content does belong, as it is related to other sections in the article (there is also a "Diving Physiology" section, so the suggested excerpt is not out of place). In addition, all of the suggested information is appropriately cited

The added content is neutral; it is not biased. The content is not persuasive; it merely presents truthful information that is necessary to understanding a sea turtle's sensory modalities.

The new content is backed by reliable sources of information. However, the sources are not written by a diverse spectrum of authors; they are mostly from the same authors (Brothers and Lohmann). This may need to be revised so as to include similar information from other authors so that the content is more reliable and comprehensive. However, most of the sources are recent and all of the links do work.

The content is well-written, easy to read and does not have any grammatical errors.

The content is not yet fully fleshed out; the author must add the proposed bullet points that she outlines so as to make the content more comprehensive and accurate. The bullet points are broken down into sections that make sense and reflect major points on the topic of sensory modalities.

The images that the author has included are well-captioned and are laid out in a visually appealing way. However, they are not necessary and do not enhance the understanding of the topic. The images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations.

Overall, the proposed addition to the "Sea Turtle" article does include information that is lacking and would be a valuable addition. However, the reliability of the suggested addition would be strengthened had it included information from a larger variety of sources that agrees with the information from the author's current sources.