User:Gjkiprotich/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating? Academic discipline
(Provide a link to the article here.)

== Why you have chosen this article to evaluate? I chose this article because it mainly focus on college and higher education students and I am a college student so it adds some values to my awareness and enable me to pass arguments to some of the expertise works of creativity and critical thinking. ==

(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

== Evaluate the article The article is well developed and relevant to the topic because it talks about the roots of most academic disciplines with the union of people from different academic disciplines and professions, working together as equal stakeholders in addressing a common challenge. I think the article is has some bias in it because it only focuses on college and higher education and not explaining anything concerning high school and lower grade schools. Also concerning references the article does not have all references for every work some are only made up as peoples own work of creation. I think what needs to be improved from this article is to update a source with current civilized volume of scientific information and increase rapid research because from the article prior to the twentieth century, few opportunities existed for science. From the emergence of new and different academic disciplines there was notable equity gaps during the emergence of interdisciplinary scientific fields of study such as biochemistry and geophysics which gained prominence as their contribution to knowledge became widely recognized. Also the article sources come from a diverse array of peer reviews for instance the foundation of scholars of specific interest and expertise. But this article as a very nice development. ==

(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)