User:Gjoe1973/Diablo Lake/Adrifaye Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Gjoe1973


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Gjoe1973/Diablo Lake


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Diablo Lake

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead- The lead section has been changed to have a new title of "summary" in the draft which I believe that title of "summary" should be removed. The lead section does a good job of introducing the topic in a concise manner and includes a brief description of the major sections. However, the lead does contain information about kayaking which is never mentioned again in the article, so they may consider removing this part or adding more about it in the body section of the page.

Content- The content does appear to be relevant and up to date. I think that there may be some content possibly missing, but I do recognize that we were only assigned to add a few paragraphs. If you have time, I'd maybe consider adding more to the dam portion as there is more information in the Diablo Dam article that could be added to that section. Also, if you do want to keep the part about kayaking in the lead, I would consider adding information about that to the recreation section. Also, you may consider adding more to that section in general as many of the sub topics are only one sentence.

Tone and Balance- The entirety of the article and added sections maintain a very neutral tone. I would not say that it was attempting to persuade a reader in any way and it did not appear biased at all, so very good job here!

Sources- Everything seems to be backed up by a source, and all of the sources seem to be very reliable and active. The links all work, and the sources are current and thorough. My only thought is that although government sites are reliable and very good sources for this article, possibly consider adding a few sources that aren't government ran to maybe offer a more diverse perspective.

Organization- Very well organized, sections are clearly laid out and relate to the content. Content is well written and does not contain any spelling or grammatical errors.

Images- The images do a very good job at enhancing the page, as they show you where the lake is located and what it looks like. They are laid out in an appealing way and are well-captioned. I don't see a source for these images but I also may be looking in the wrong place, so if it is missing, consider adding one to avoid copyright violations.