User:Gjose3/sandbox

Article evaluation
Not My Life is a documentary film based on human trafficking among children and adults. It is also a film about slavery. It was released in 2011 and It was also written, produced, and directed by Robert Bilheimer. The film took 4 years to make and had 13 different countries involved in It.

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? A: Yes everything is related to the article topic. One part that I felt distracted me was the "Reception". I didn't feel like this part had to be part of the article.

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? A: There is no information out of date. There is nothing missing that could be added.

What else could be improved? A: More background on human trafficking and what led to the producing of a movie with this type of message.

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? A: This article is neutral. There aren't claims that appear heavily biased.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? A: Underrepresented.

Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? A: Yes the links work. The does support the claims in the article.

Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? A: Yes they are reliable references. The information come from different websites like PBS. These sources are not neutral because these sources voice their opinion on human trafficking. It is not noted.

What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? A: They are trying to bring light to this topic and show people that human trafficking still goes on today.

How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? A:It is rated FA-class and yes it is.

How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? A: Wikipedia discusses this topic with a neutral standpoint. In the article there wasn't much of an opinion. The article has only information and facts. Human trafficking wasn't discussed in class but it can be considered part of culture. Human trafficking may be part of someone's culture and they may feel like it is a normal thing. Culture is something that we spoke about in class.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_My_Life

Article Selection
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liza_Koshy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revlon https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dance_therapy

Is the article's content relevant to the topic? A: For all of my articles the content is relevant to the topic because Liza Koshy is a YouTuber and my topic was female YouTuber. Revlon is revenant because my topic was cosmetics and nail polish is apart of that category. Dane therapy is relevant to its topic because the topic was dancing and dance therapy was the main article.

Is it written neutrally? A: All these articles are written neutrally.

Does each claim have a citation? A: Yes each claim has its own citation

Are the citations reliable? A: Yes

The Revlon article is the only article without a WikiProject. To improve these articles maybe they can add a more recent picture of Liza Koshy, for a longer list of see also for Revlon, and for dance therapy they should add people who are famous for dance therapy or people who are really good at dance therapy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gjose3 (talk • contribs) 08:26, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Article Editing
I chose to do Dance Therapy. I plan on editing a dance therapy article. My dance therapy source is https://adta.org. I plan on using this website to make my editing more accurate. There are many kinds of information on this website like the history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gjose3 (talk • contribs) 16:57, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Watchlist
https://adta.org/#