User:Gkrohe/Evaluate an Article

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I selected this article to evaluate because I am a biology major and I was told about this game by one of my professors. He seemed to think highly of this game, so I took the opportunity to learn a bit more about it.

Evaluate the article
Firstly, the lead section does a good job of quickly introducing the topic and explaining what the game is about. It briefly mentions two of the major sections but fails to introduce the third, which is "Reception". I would argue that the lead section is concise and well written. The content itself is very informational. However, the "Reception" section may not need to be included. This is because it begins to feel less neutral as more opinions about the quality of the game are inserted. This is also the only problem from a neutrality standpoint, as the rest of the article is neutral. The sources are numerous and listed. Citations seem to work properly. The article is well written and does not contain grammatical errors. The inclusion of more images would probably be useful to some, as it would provide a visual for those curious. There is not much conversation happening on the talk page as this specific page is handled by WikiProject Board and table games. This article is of good quality. The information is helpful, the writing is concise, and it was cited properly. It could be improved by removing the "Reception" section in order to maintain neutrality. Overall, this is a well developed article.