User:Glackinm1/Fishing Baits/Taylorg26 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Glackinm1


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Glackinm1/Fishing Baits


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Fishing bait

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The Lede is written very well, they added more information and sources, it prepares the reader for what they are about to read and what sections. It gives just enough information without giving away what is written in the article. They added relevant topics to the article talked about the environment impact on artificial baits, and diseases that can spread by using natural baits. The content that was added is neutral and doesn't show persuade a reader in any directs, it is simply information about the difference in natural and artificial baits. The content is backed up by reliable sources of information and the articles are semi relevant, the oldest one is from the 1970 and the most relevant is from 2022. A lot of the sources are form the same website from Science Direct, and the link for the 6th source doesn't work. There are images in the original article that are good, but need more explaining/ information. I think that this article is well written and it gives good information on the topic and goes into detail. I would try to add more links to words so it can give people more detail. I also think that maybe they can add what types of worms are used or even where you can get live bait. And talk about different types of artificial bait and where to get those from.