User:Glalria/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: (link) Betty White Talk:Betty White
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. It seemed interesting to me.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes. It describes her and who is she is.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes, there is a box.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No, everything is included.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It's simple.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes its a biography.
 * Is the content up-to-date? Yes it was last updated November 7th.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? Everything is there, I don't see any content gaps.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? Yes it talks about her. Just her.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No not really.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No all neutral standing.
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? Nope just inform.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes all references are listed below.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? yes, links are provided.
 * Are the sources current? Some are old articles because some facts are from a long time ago.
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Yes, there are a wide variety of sources.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? yes.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Its very clear.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? No.
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? All organized.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? It has a few images, not many.
 * Are images well-captioned? Yes.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yes.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Yes.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? Some are saying some passages aren't done or need updating.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? Not seeing where to find this.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? Most of them are just suggesstions.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? It looks clean to me.
 * What are the article's strengths? There are many facts and good paragraphs.
 * How can the article be improved? There are places where things can be summed up to lessen the overflow of information.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? Well developed..

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: