User:Glasstoad/Lavender Panthers/Mackley25 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

glasstoad


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Glasstoad/Lavender Panthers
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Lavender Panthers

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented or underrepresented? - there aren't really viewpoints expressed, but rather the actual happenings that aren't necessarily subjective. I suppose one viewpoint could be the perception that cops were not fulfilling their expected role, and thus street patrol groups emerged. though, even that is a bit of a stretch- these aren't really arguments or opinions.

Check the citations. Do the links work? - we discussed how the links dont all work- wiki did something weird.

Does the source support the claims in the article? there are many sources (yay), and the article does not make inference, but clearly explains where each piece of info comes from in order to protect validity.

Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? yes! yay! no more tabloids!

Where does the information come from? the page lists seven different sources, which come from academic articles that are backed by both schools and history journals.

Are these neutral sources? while i did not read the sources, it does seem that Ryann took care to select credible sources that report rather than offer a persuasive thesis.

Is any information out of date? does not seem to be

Is anything missing that should be added? Dr. Biro Walters went over some spaces where you could expand, and those sounded great! i don't have any suggestions atm but please shoot me an email if you want a second opinion- i love this!