User:Gmmuell/Beth Levine (physician)/Wmossbrook Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Gmmuell


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Gmmuell/Beth_Levine_(physician)?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Beth Levine (physician) - Wikipedia

Lead
The article has been updated with the new information contained in the users sandbox. The lead in the article is clear and concise and provides a nice overview of Beth Levine's career. Working with women in STEM is a good choice as it addresses one of wikipedias equity groups as well. Highlighting her education and briefly exploring describing her area of expertise provides a nice introduction to her life.

Content
All of the content presented is relevant to the topic of the article. The information provided on her education is informative. However, the simple lists of accomplishments do not help much. It would be more beneficial to explore her research and the developments that stemmed from them. Explaining the research that lead to these awards would provide a lot of key information to her life, like explaining how exploring autophagy lead to breakthroughs in infectious disease. Also, information on her early life would be helpful. It would let us know how she grew up so we can see her path through life.

Tone and Balance
The tone and balance of the article are very good. There are no clear biases present. Facts are simply stated with no added "fluff".

Organization
The structure and grammar of this article are very good. I did not notice any errors when reading through and the sections are clearly labeled and the information provided in each section pertains to it.

Overall
The content added contributed a lot to the article. Without the content contributed, there would not be much of an article to review. By simply adding the value of her research and some personal life information, this article would really shine.