User:Gmoore12/Collodictyon/Vferreiraa12 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Gmoore12


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Gmoore12/Collodictyon
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Collodictyon

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Overall the information given was very non biased, and flowed from sentence to sentence. I believe that to improve this article draft you can include a citation from the links you had given to the paragraph. On the subject of the details you gave, I think there could have been a picture added to the wiki draft the maybe help the reader visually see the "Sulcus" (if you could find one). I do like that you explain what certain words mean after mentioning them in the latter sentence. I think the information you placed in the draft will add to the information already published article, so that is a very good thing. The sentences are legible, and there is no misspelling.