User:Gnmahon18/Wildlife conservation/Tmp1071 Peer Review

General info
(provide username) Gnmahon18
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Gnmahon18/Wildlife conservation - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Wildlife conservation - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Your edits are well written. However, I think that the "TikTok" section is very opinionated in its language. I also think that it is being expanded upon too much in comparison to the depth of the rest of the article. If you want to keep this section, simply keep the statements, "Illegal wildlife trade has also become normalized through various social media outlets, such as Tik Tok. There are a number of TikTok accounts that have gone viral for their depiction of exotic pets, such as various monkey and bird species." I think that the expansion of this topic belongs under the TikTok page rather than a Wildlife Conservation page. I also would change the source that you're getting this information from. A magazine is not a reputable source for a Wikipedia article. Perhaps try to find some peer-reviewed scholarly sources.

Your Climate Change topic edits are good. I would make sure that you're linking sources so that I know your information is valid. Right now, I can question whether or not these claims are real because there is no citation.