User:Gnurwono/Translational glycobiology/Nistoner Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Gnurwono


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Gnurwono/Translational glycobiology


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * Lead: The lead section is very strong. You have a good summary of the topic with your first sentence, and give a detailed outline of your article. The section is concise but provides enough detail to give a clear outline.
 * Content: It seems like you made your article from scratch and did an awesome job including relevant information. The only feedback I'd give is that a majority of the sources used are 5+ years old. They're probably still good sources, but having more recent articles could be valuable since the article is discussing current research interests in glycobiology.
 * Tone: The tone is good. It remains academic and doesn't appear biased.
 * Sources: See content feedback. Overall having 14 relevant sources gave your article a lot of credibility. All of the facts you stated were backed up by a source.
 * Organization: I really like the organization of your article. I liked how the article began with a general history and background before diving into specific applications.
 * Images: The use of images adds visual appeal to the article. Finding an image that incorporates color could also help make the article more appealing.
 * New Article Requirements: The article seems to meet all of the requirements for notability, and is a very strong foundation for the start of the Translational Glycobiology article.