User:Go23bears/Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on social media/RiaVora Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)
 * Go23bears
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Go23bears/sandbox

Lead
Guiding questions

Lead evaluation
Since these are just drafts, they have not been added to the actual article and therefore not incorporated into the lead

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Yes, it talks about the rise of social media and other online platform usage, as well as movements that gained heightened popularity during COVID-19
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Yes, it is relevant to this year
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * There is no content that doesn't belong, but more can always be said about BLM and the increased usage of social media
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
 * No, but it does describe BLM, which can be considered a historically marginalized population if that counts

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * The article seems to be a bit biased in favor of people using social media platforms, but it is minor issue
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Same as above, a slight skew towards people using social media platforms
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Every line and paragraph is cited by information, not sure if it is all considered a secondary source of information
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Yes, and they reflect unbiased sources
 * Are the sources current?
 * Yes, they are all from 2020
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * They do include reliable sources, there could be more from the perspective of black individuals for the BLM part, as a historically marginalized population
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Yes

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * In most parts, but it is missing commas in some sections that could use some.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Other than the commas, not that I could find!
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes, it reflects the use of online mediums during COVID-19

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * There could be more sources for sections, such as BLM, but each source seems reliable
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * As mentioned above, seems great but could use more black perspective
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Yes
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?
 * No, it should! Especially to help with BLM section

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * Yes! Added very necessary content
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * Reliable sources, well-structured
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * Commas, Links to other articles, and more perspective sources