User:Goalscorer30/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Talk:Connor Bedard - Wikipedia.)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(I am interested in ice hockey and Connar Bedard was last season's number one draft pick. I am interested to learn more about him.)

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead appeared a bit long and had a lot of information on his awards and winnings, wasn't too concise. A lot of the facts were backed up with citations but there were some stats or facts that needed to be cited. Had many links that were working which would further explain the use of the terms. However, the sections were super long and could've had more spacing of subheadings. The talk page was a bit concerning. There was lots of going back and forth regarding vandalism/opinions on the topic.