User:Gobears18/FiscalNote/DrPronoun Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

https://dashboard.wikiedu.org/users/Gobears18


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Gobears18/FiscalNote?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * FiscalNote

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? The content is mostly relevant, except for the awards section which is too short. It could be aligned into a different section.
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Yes, all the content is relevant and up-to-date.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * In the sub-section, they have covered content in neutrality by adding to the article.
 * Is the content added neutral?
 * The content seems like NPOV, but could be heavily skewed in over-representing the impact of FiscalNote and how it might change the world.
 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes, all sources seem reliable, backed up by multiple sources.
 * Are the sources current?
 * Yes, all sources are current and backed up the last ten years.
 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * The article could be strengthened by giving a new perspective from a different competitor or a regulatory stance.
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * The content adds awareness to Civic Technologies of how this new product could change the world with innovation and transparency.
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * Combine the awards section with the Overview section about global innovation for the 2022 SAAS Awards.