User:Gobears18/FiscalNote/Malak8462000 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Gobears18


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Gobears18/FiscalNote?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * FiscalNote

Evaluate the drafted changes
The content that is being added is relevant to the topic since there are sections added like its relation to civic technology, the awards it has received, an overview and it's history. All of the work added is cited correctly. The citations all seem to be from neutral sources that aren't opinionated such as a link from the MIT Technology Review. I really enjoyed how there was a section called delete where the writer explored what already existed on the topic on wikipedia and realized that some of the sections are irrelevant and meant to attract people to the platform. One thing that didn't seem neutral was the conspiracy heading and the information present within. It didn't seem like the author was trying to sway us in any way, but it seemed when you say something like 'leave them at a disadvantage' it seems like there is an opinion there. Maybe to make it more neutral the author could forgo the disadvantage part and stick to facts on how it is unaffordable. Overall. the edits the author intendeds to add are very insightful and would add a lot to the already existing article.