User:Gobrans17/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Public art in Barcelona

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I thought the subject matter was interesting. The subject matters from a historical prospective. My preliminary impression was positive, as the page contains many interesting visual points along with the written information.

Evaluate the article
Content

Content was relevant for this topic, no information presented was distracting. Information seems up to date in the sources and includes sections as recently as the 1992 Olympics. More information on art in the middle ages could be provided (this section is quite short). Although it may be difficult to do so, since more information from this time point may not be historically available.

Tone

The article is neutral in tone. No points are over/underrepresented.

Sources

The links are functional and provide information related to the article. Links lead to other wiki pages about artists and art pieces mentioned throughout the page. The references are appropriate for the article, neutral, and primarily come from book sources.

Organization and Writing

The article is easy to read, divided into useful sections, and written with a professional tone (without grammar mistakes or writing errors).

Images and Media

Images are relevant to the content of the page and are visually interesting. As the piece is about art, they significantly enhance the page. Captions are relevant and provide art piece names, dates, and artists.

Talk Page

The discussion page is not very active.

Overall Impression

Overall, the article was enjoyable to read and well written. It provides interesting information and is organized in a manner that is easy to understand. I enjoyed the gallery at the bottom, but think it could be expanded. The info on the 1888 expo could be broken up to make it easier to read, but I think the information is interesting as a whole.