User:GojoJ/Lifestyle disease/Kmj2016 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

GojoJ


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Editing User:R0a01gz/Varroa destructor - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Varroa destructor - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

From reading the Varroa destructor article and then reading the draft that was posted I think it is well written and detailed for the specific "Monitoring" topic. The content used from the sources seems to be fairly up-to-date and relevant to the overall topic because it is a very broad article. I think the lead of the draft can possibly be updated to it can cover all areas throughout the article. The introductory sentence can possibly be updated as well. The draft has an image and I think it is relevant to the overall topic and captioned correctly.