User:Golbow1115/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Fuwa-chan - Wikipedia

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
When I read the article, I felt that the article was not correct and reliable.

Evaluate the article
The lead section shows who she is, but a few sentences are not detailed or objective and do not have reliable sources of information.

The contents are too short and have some information that one's sources are uncertain.

The tone is from a fan's point of view, not a neutral one.

The references are clearly stated, and sources are almost the latest, but some sources are not reliable sites, and writers are not known, so inappropriate.

The organization and writing quality are not bad because the article is easy to read.

There are any images and media, so the article should be added them.

I agree with the talk page's discussion, which shows that the article has poor sources.

To sum up, it is easy to read the article because it is short, but there are many inappropriate parts because the sources of the information are not certain, and the way the information is written is not neutral. Therefore, it is a good idea to start with reliable articles that contain her own statements and Twitter and Youtube statements that she published.