User:Gold024/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Psychiatry

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose to evaluate this article because I have an interest in psychiatry and the diagnosis process for a patient. I have also recently undergone this process and the questions they ask are interesting. My preliminary impression of this article is that there are a lot of citations and a lot of information that seems legit.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead section - provided a detailed background of what psychiatry is and a lot of medical talk about it

Content - The content is focussed and for the most part seems up to date. There are a couple sections where information seems unnecessary to know about. However most of the sections are helpful.

Tone and Balance - The article is well balanced and not persuasive in anyway. Everything is written in the tone that it should be.

Sources - There were a lot of sources. I think the use of them is done well and the amount of sources that were used is helpful.

Images - There was a lack of media and images in the page and I think there could have been more incorporated.

Overall - I think this was well written, but there was a lack of images and media and there could have been more. The language and sources were well used too