User:GoldFinch14/Ascophyllum/Nsg1029 Peer Review

General info
GoldFinch14
 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:GoldFinch14/Ascophyllum - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Ascophyllum - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Content:

The new content added is relevant to the article and is mostly up to date. I do not believe that there is any unrelated content that was added to the article by mistake.

Tone:

The tone stays neutral and does not lead the reader to form any conclusions.

Organization:

Within the first addition remove "extreme cases" and just leave it as "in rare cases". For the reproduction paragraph I think there should be a transition sentence to make it flow better.

replace the word "seems" in the uses paragraph and name one of the herbal teas its used in.

References:

the sources are mostly up to date and all come from reputable sources and the links work.