User:Goldenflowergarden/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Medical ethnomusicology https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_ethnomusicology

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because I am really huge music fan and I am interested in learning more about the impact of music. This matters because music has been found to have many medical benefits that can help improve one's health. My preliminary impression of the article was that it looked complete and had a long list of references.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead section of the article clearly introduces the topics discussed in the article without giving too much or too little detail. The article's content is through, up to date, but does not include information about an underrepresented topic. The article covers all topics equally and neutrally and does not seem to attempt to persuade the reader of anything. The sources seem reliable and the links work, although some of them are around 20 years old, so they might be a little outdated. The structure and writing quality of the article is good. The article does not have images. There is some preliminary conversation in the talk page, but it seems to not be active anymore. The article is not rated. I think the article provides sufficient information about the topic, but I also think there is more information that can be added to improve the article.