User:Gompk/Archive2019

October 2019
Freedom for hong kong, the revolution of our times. This user is primarily removing pro-human rights edits, and believes that wikipedia should not support freedom, despite being a free encyclopedia. Weird aye? This is what happens when the editors are indifferent to genocide, and prefer to keep their edit count high. [ 2600:1700:12B0:3000:E16B:2154:E153:28FC ]


 * Information.svg Hello. As I have tried to communicate to you, your editing on China-related pages, despite their good motivations constitutes vandalism. Please reserve subjective matter such as this for forums outside of wikipedia. You should note that Wikipedia, as a neutral body, illustrates strongly across countless articles the Human Rights abuses of China. As you say, it is an encyclopaedia, not an op-ed column. It is not the place of a factual body to offer a medium for protest, no matter how valid. I appreciate your intent, but, as I have said before, vandalism is not the answer. I would suggest using your time instead to appeal to those whom can make a difference. Please note that further vandalism of other articles or of my own page could result in a ban from Wikipedia.

Fin 22 (talk) 04:06, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Accusations
Hello there, from Portugal,

a veteran of 13 years of editing here, reduced to anon status due to vicious stalking. Care to elaborate the article i "vandalised" so that i can see what further needs to be done (your message mentioned no article)?

Attentively --81.193.141.118 (talk) 23:20, 10 October 2019 (UTC)


 * My apologies, the revert was accidental - have since fixed it. Sorry! Fin 22 (talk) 23:23, 10 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Happens to the best, no worries! Also, i do admit my summary at Marco Matias (footballer) (just found which article now) could be misinterpreted as it was not 100% technical.


 * Happy editing, and such --81.193.141.118 (talk) 23:27, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Why am I in the wrong?
Do not ban me, for I am a good person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.31.131.39 (talk) 02:12, 11 October 2019 (UTC)


 * @204.31.131.39, Your edits on Full stop and on Ellipsis were vandalism, and I reverted them as such. You are welcome to experiment in your sandbox. Fin 22 (talk) 02:20, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Vandalism
Hello,

I am not vandalizing. I am spreading Sanatan Dharma. I do not mind speaking further regarding this claim against me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.30.208.27 (talk) 02:41, 17 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi. You have made 3 edits, all of which direct to this website. These edits appear to be in promotion of this website, and as such, were removed accordingly. Please do not use Wikipedia for promotional purposes. Fin 22 (talk) 02:47, 17 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Hello,


 * I am a believer of God. I notice on your web page you are an atheist. If this is so, you are not the right type of person to monitor a webpage that says Avatar, as this is a descent of the God. Please stop bullying me and allow me to spread my witness of the current manifestation of God. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.30.208.27 (talk) 02:52, 17 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The religious nature of the articles and of your edits are immaterial - adding a clearly promotional website link in the middle of articles is vandalism. I have submitted a block request for this IP. Fin 22 (talk) 03:02, 17 October 2019 (UTC)