User:GonzagaFoodie509~2019/sandbox

CitizenFour Article Review (Student Article)
As part of the course content, I reviewed an additional article titled Citizenfour. Here are some recommendations and feedback on the article. Overall the article is already well written.


 * The title and the introduction paragraph of the article is short, to the point and simple. It doesn't present confusion and doesn't indicate a question. It addresses the topic and there is a well known celebrity on the image that is uploaded as part for a good example.
 * First sentence and paragraph is useful, gives a good overview of what the article will be related to. First few sentences have neutral perspectives. It could add more sources the ensure that all the sources are cited.
 * I think that it is helpful that the title page has the picture of the movie cover with Edward Snowden on the from. It helps that there are other pages tied to those that have their own wiki page.
 * Formatting is consistent across the entire article. There are good breaks and section dividers that help keep the article organized.
 * The way that the article is written is concise and with good communication. It doesn't use confusing verbiage and also has sources to cite other articles and individuals who also have several wiki pages.
 * Acronyms are explained and draws correlation to major issues that are correlating to the broader article content.
 * Provides the dates that the movie was released and general timelines of the events that have happened since the documentary was released.
 * Valuable sections provide the individuals that were part of the documentary and important stakeholders that have been part of the launch and topic rewrites. Does not seem one sided and provide an informative and concise viewpoint.
 * Award Nomination list and lawsuit was also included as part of the page which gives more insight on broader scope of the documentary.
 * Reader is able to make their own determinations based on the information that is provided. After completely reading the article and exploring the links, it is my opinion that the article is written well and minor edits are all that are needed.

Sources for further research
CitizenFour Movie

The Body Issue Article Review
As part of the course content, I am looking to review an additional article titled The Body Issue. Here are some initial reactions to the article while incorporating the reference checklist criteria.


 * The title of the article is short, to the point and simple. It doesn't present confusion and doesn't indicate a question. It addresses the topic and there is a well known celebrity on the image that is uploaded as part for a good example.
 * First sentence and paragraph is useful, gives a good overview of what the article will be related to. First few sentences have neutral perspectives. It could add more sources the ensure that all the sources are cited.
 * The way that the article is written is concise and with good communication. It doesn't use confusing verbiage and also has sources to cite ESPN which is the publishing company of the issue.
 * Acronyms are explained and draws correlation to major issues that are correlating to the broader article content.
 * Provides the dates that the issue was released and general timelines that have published since the first issue.
 * Valuable sections provide the years of specific publishing and references the additional articles that were included for this year. Does not seem one sided and provide an informative and concise viewpoint.
 * Reader is able to make their own determinations based on the information that is provided. After completely reading the article and exploring the links, it is my opinion that the article is written well and minor edits are all that are needed.

Erin's Peer Review
Your article evaluation is very through and covers a lot of ground. I looked the your article and I could not find anything to day. Nice work!

Article Evaluation
Content - I am choosing to do an article evaluation on 97 Bonnie & Clyde. There are a few things that came to mind as soon as I started reviewing the article. Section at the top of the article says that there are additional sources needed and that it may not meet the Wikipedia Notability standards. There are words in the article; "may be part of X album," so this leads me to believe that a lot of the content may be of someone's opinion and that they are not 100% sure about what they published. Also seems to be by written from a hypothetical point of view and not necessarily cited from concrete references. Some of the verbiage that was used seems to be somewhat inappropriate but since Wikipedia is about facts then it is correct in publishing what this artist put on the cover of their album. Areas of opportunity may be to add more references and content.

Tone - Seems to be unbiased and neutral. There isn't someone's opinion tied to the article. Although some content may be offensive towards the reader there does not seem to be a personal biased included as part of the article content. No viewpoints are over presented or under presented. However, because the article is talking about a song from an album of the artist Eminem then some of the content could be subjective. The article is written from a standpoint of explanation of the song 97 Bonnie & Clyde.

Sources - The citations in the article work. Some of the sources support where the article is coming from. There are external and internal citations which gives credit to some of the information that is being brought up as part of the article. Fact is referenced by published list of songs that the artist released as well as news articles that were written as part of a review of the song. Although the articles come from a personal view, the Wikipedia article stays neutral.

Talk - There isn't a talk page established for this page. This would be a page that needs additional edits and users to contribute in order to make it a sound, well-referenced page. The fact that there aren't other users is an inclination of the topic maybe no longer being relevant or if that there isn't more user interest in the topic in order to get more edits.

Notes/Bibliography
Social Media Textbook