User:Goondog101/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)Anthrozoology

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because I am interested in animals and their relationship with humans. Anthrozoology is a very broad term and seems like a good topic to expand on.

My first impression of this article is that there isn't a lot of information on the topic, but the article seems to be well written and organized.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.) The leading few sentences of the article are very strong. The first sentence of the article clearly explains the definition of Anthrozoology. The first paragraph explains the main focus of anthrozoology and some related fields of study. Second paragraph states the name of a major influence on Anthrozoology. There are two following labeled sections that explain the areas of study as well as the expansion of interest in Anthrozoology. I think that there is a lot more information that could be added in this page. This includes the history and background of anthrozoology, and how it came to be a term. This also could include studies done with human-animal relations. Article is well cited and the writing quality is good. Captions in bold could be adjusted to make more sense. Only one picture but cited properly and is a good use of the picture in relation to the topic. Oldest citation used is from 2011. Tone of the article is neutral. Overall, more information and related studies needs to be added to this article to make it stronger.