User:Gooobster/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Gravitational singularity

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
It is a topic Aim interested to learn more about.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead Section

 * The introductory sentence clearly describes the article's topic
 * The leading section does not touch on some of the topics present in the article such as Entropy.
 * "quantum mechanics does not permit particles to inhabit a space smaller than their wavelengths." is not mentioned anywhere else in the article.
 * The leading section is broad enough and does not get to detailed

Content

 * The content is relevant the topic
 * The newest source is from 2021, The information is up to date.
 * The last section, Entropy, feels put of place.
 * This article does not address any underrepresented populations

Tone and Balance

 * The article as a whole stays neutral. There is no favored view point of fringe opinion.

Sources and References

 * Most facts are supported by citation
 * There is a broad range of sources
 * There is a citation that reflects recent breakthroughs in the topic
 * Authors cited reside from all around the world, but the article does not go out of its way to cite an author from an under represented group
 * multiple textbooks and peer review articles are cited.
 * links work

Organization and Writing Quality

 * The article is concise, but also veers into in-depth equations that a majority of the people reading the article would not understand.
 * There are a couple hiccups in grammar
 * The article is well organized, but some sections need to be expanded upon or dropped entirely

Images and Media

 * there are two images and one GIF. The animated GIF distracts from the articles content
 * The images are well captioned and adhere to guidelines
 * All the images are small relegated to the right side of the page, not very visually pleasing

Talk Page Discussion

 * This page has been sparse on conversations in recent month. a lot of questions have not been answered
 * This article is rated a C. The article is under wikiproject Physics, the relativity task force, and Astronomy

Overall impressions

 * The article needs some major improvements
 * Its opening section is strong, its concise and delivers all the necessary information
 * The weakest section in the article is the last one. its very short and ends on a very confusing sentence not related to the topic.
 * overall I would access that the article is underdeveloped in a few key areas.