User:Goopletss/Personality type/Ecruz6 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Goopletss


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Personality type


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

The lead of this article definitely includes the introductory sentence that describes the article's topic. Multiple sections are included in this article that specifically describe the topic that is being targeted. The Lead was not overly detailed due to the fact that the rest of the topics were not covered in the introduction paragraph.

Content/Sources

The content of this article covers multiple parts of one topic which was interesting. This article started with a brief introduction of personality types, Clinical aspect of it, types vs. traits, and ways to prevent different personality types. This article had really great information but I think that by removing some information will make this article more pleasing. I personally believe that the author used a lot of different sources for this article which makes it hard to read and understand the main purpose of the topic. Using less sources and more peer-reviewed scholarly articles would've been helpful.

Tone & Balance

The tone of this article is neutral. In this article, I would say that the topic was overrepresented because there many subtopics that also helped support the topic.

Organization

The flow of this article is very neat! All of the sources that the author used as references are current and reflect that the author described. It is well-written but not concise.

Images & Media

It would be helpful to add more images to help the reader understand the different concepts that are explained in this article.