User:Goopletss/Personality type/GermanShepherdMom1 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Goopletss


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Personality type


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Personality type

Evaluate the drafted changes
I will be evaluating the article itself because the sandbox information is confusing as to what you added and where. I like how much information this article already has. It looks quite complete, but needs a little editing. Looking through the article, the lead section needs more information. It does not have important information about the Carl Jung sections. Make sure your lead section has the importance of the topic and that it reflects the rest of the article. This way your readers know what the article will be about and if it is relevant for them to read.

The article has good organization and it is clear to understand when a new section is starting. Each section has around the same length of information, so it is well balanced. The Carl Jung sections and midsections take up most of the article, but it is relevant information and I think you should leave it. I would look through the article and make sure your headings have capitalized words that are important and that need to be capitalized. For example, I would capitalize traits in the heading "Types vs. traits". Overall, I did not see any grammatical errors or spelling errors. I still would double check it to see because I may have missed a error or two. Maybe change the heading titled "Type theories" to make it clear and to where it flows better. This way your readers understand what the heading title means because it seems confusing.

The tone of your article does not seem biased and is more neutral to me. This is good and makes your article more professional and gives facts with no opinions.

The sources on the article have a couple articles that are not within the ten year time frame, but I still think they are from good sites. I clicked on a couple links and they seemed to work, but make sure you go through all of them. Check to make sure the sources are reliable and are relevant sources. I think you are doing great and keep up the good work!

~