User:Goos262/Pseudanthias hawaiiensis/WillowTakahashi Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Goos262


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * 


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Pseudanthias hawaiiensis

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Hey Goos262, when I was starting my article draft, the first thing I did was scan the Leeward Library and Google Scholar search engines to find information on my species. These are reliable resources so I knew that any information I collected from these engines were okay to use in the article. I found one mention of your species in the Leeward Library and I found a couple articles that mention your species with Google Scholar so looking at those might be a good first step. The current Wiki Page for your species includes some anatomy and habitat information as well as a picture image. I suggest focusing on adding to the Cultural Significance section of the article and maybe adding more information about Pseudanthias Hawaiiensis's behavior. For example, in my article draft, I mentioned how my species uses empty tube worm holes as shelters.

One last tip I have for you is, if you find there is limited information from journals and other peer reviewed works like the ones listed in the Library and Google Scholar, using websites/articles from College Institutions is also acceptable. I had to source from 2 college websites in order to add more information to my article.

Other than that, best of luck with your draft!