User:Gopiga.dass/Deafness in Tunisia/Kjb1818 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Gopiga.dass


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Deafness in Tunisia


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead: good lead, it’s straight to the point with the important facts and everything is backed up with citations.

Content: everything is super informative and goes deep into detail about each statement.

Sources: all seem reliable and are easy to find where the information is coming from.

Overall, everything looks good and is well organized. The article just needs to be finished up where clarification needed is written and expand on this is written. Otherwise really good information and is easy to follow along and understand.