User:Gorditagirl21/26th of July Movement/Kskornyes Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Gorditagirl21
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: 26th of July Movement

Lead
Evaluation:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * It is concise but with additional details when necessary.

Content
Evaluation:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Relevant but specific- not adding general content but adding information about specific instances that add value to the article.
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Hard to tell without a source
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * The content that was added is valuable and enhances the article. Hard to tell if anything is missing, but certainly nothing that has been added seems to be out of place.

Tone and Balance
Evaluation:


 * The tone is clinical and factual, what has been added is void of opinions and seems to have no particular viewpoints or biased political leanings. There is no intention to persuade, only to inform.

Sources and References
Evaluation:


 * There doesn't appear to be any added sources to the article, and the large added section under the title 'Political and Military Action' seems to have no source associated with it. The sources that are listed appear to be relatively recent, most being from the early 2000s. The links listed under "External Links" are all live and operational.

Organization
Evaluation:


 * The content is well written and has good ideas but could use a little proofreading. The overall organization of the added topics is well executed.

Overall impressions
Evaluation:


 * The article quality has been improved by the added information- while it is still maybe slightly incomplete, it is certainly on its way there. The added understanding of the kinds of actions the group took are very useful and serve to contextualize more of what the group was actually about.