User:Gpp105io/Human trafficking in California/Yessel Garcia Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) Isabelle Osorio
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Isabelleosorio/Human trafficking in California

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * some sources date back to 2003 which is not recent but one seems to be from 2018 and that is more up to date info
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * you mention that you moved some examples but Im not sure as to where they were moved
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
 * yes, I believe so

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * no
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * no, all sections seems to be relatively the same sizes (except maybe the role of coyotes section
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * no

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * annual reports and studies seem reliable but can't check because there is no link to sources
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * yes but needs links
 * Are the sources current?
 * some seem to be but can't seem to be sure because there are no citations to show the year of publication
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * don't know the authors because they are not cited
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * there are no links to new sources but the links connecting to other wiki pages work

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * yes, the information that was removed or reorganized made the overall article more concise and clear
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * no
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * yes

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * yes
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * made sections of the article much more easier to read and digest
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * perhaps just create a bibliography with the sources used and link the sources so they are accessible to the reader