User:Grace.blackwell/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Stauromedusae
 * Article Evaluation
 * Lead section: Has a good introductory sentence, with a brief description of the organism. It does not have major sections. The lead is concise with the appropriate amount of detail
 * Content: Content is relevant to the topic, although there is not a lot of content on the page. The last edit was in September of 2021.
 * Tone and Balance: The article is in a neutral tone, with no biased positions, viewpoints that are overrepresented, or attempts to persuade the reader in favor of one position or another.
 * Organization and writing quality: It is easy to read, it flows nicely with no grammatical errors. It is well organized for the small amount of information provided.
 * Images and Media: The article includes pictures of the different organisms within the phylum that enhance the visual appealing aspect as well as the understanding of the topic. The images are all labeled or "well-captioned" and adhere to the copyright regulations.
 * Talk page discussion: It is rated low-importance on the projects importance scale as well as stub-class on the quality scale. It is a part of two discussions: WikiProject animals and WikiProject marine life. The article only covers the baseline of the phylum and class, where as during class we go into depth on the phylum.
 * Overall impressions: The article needs more within the contents section as well as providing more about the phylum as a whole including the in depth bauplan, habitat, and history. It needs more sources and overall content. There is essentially only a lead section and images. It is an underdeveloped article.
 * Overall impressions: The article needs more within the contents section as well as providing more about the phylum as a whole including the in depth bauplan, habitat, and history. It needs more sources and overall content. There is essentially only a lead section and images. It is an underdeveloped article.


 * Sources
 * Sources are up to date, reliable, and the few links that are provided, work.
 * “Stauromedusae.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 27 Sept. 2021, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stauromedusae.

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources