User:Grace.volk7/Triphosgene/Rmcconne Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Grace.volk7


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Grace.volk7/Triphosgene?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Triphosgene

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead
Has the lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?

The lead explains triphosgene in simple terms and is easy to follow.

Does the lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the articles topic?

Yes, the first sentence states the full name of the compound and the formula.

Does the lead include a brief description of the articles major sections?

The lead talks about the usage but not the preparation or safety. May need to add a few sentences about those in the lead.

Does the lead include information that is not present in the article?

The lead includes information that is present in the article. I don't see anything that shouldn't be there.

Is the lead concise or is it overly detailed?

The lead is very concise and easy to follow and understand. Doesn't have too many details and explains usage well.

Content
Is the content added relevant to the topic?

Added more to Uses which explains exactly how triphosgene can be synthesized and used. reworded and added to Safety section which made it easier to understand.

Is the content added up-to-date?

Some of the sources are from the 1980's which makes me believe that the content may be out-of-date. Maybe try looking at papers that cited those papers from the 1980's to see what new information has been found.

Is there content that is missing or does not belong?

I don't see any content that does not belong. Maybe add more information on the Structure and basic properties? the chart talks about the properties on the side, but you may need to have a paragraph for the properties and structure itself.

A section on the History may be useful (e.g. who discovered it or synthesized it)

Does the article deal with one of Wikipedias equity gaps? Does it address topics that are related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

The tone is neutral and don't seem biased.

Sources and references are great. All statements are backed by a reliable source.

The organization is concise and easy to follow. It is in a good order that helps those reading understand the concepts.

The chart/table on the side with all of the characteristics are really helpful.

Overall, I enjoyed reading and learning about Triphosgene. I had never heard of it before now, so I learned something new. Great writing!