User:Grace7474./Wind atlas/Sydney,schroeder0725 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Grace7474


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Grace7474./Wind_atlas?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
I do not know if it has not been published. It seems like there was no changes made to the page. There is only the history of the wind atlas, nothing else.

1) Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?

2) Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

3) Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

4) Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?

5) Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?