User:GraceOx/sandbox

Article Evaluation: Asexuality

The concept of asexuality is relatively new compared to other sexualities, at least in terms of being named and acknowledged. That being said, the article does a decent job at keeping everything relevant. It's unclear if the article is actually neutral, since so many points of view focus on asexuals as though they are broken or lying. It does its best to represent both viewpoints but it's difficult, the religion section in particular where religion is against anything that isn't heterosexuality, asexuality included. I can't really claim that anything is over or underrepresented because there's so little information about the topic in general. All citations/links work and lead to as unbiased sources as possible. Again, it's difficult where there are no truly neutral standings on the topic. The Talk page of this article is mainly about excess citations and missing history. The article has a GA ranking, meaning Good Article. We haven't touched upon asexuality (or sexuality in general) in class but I'm hoping we do.

This is a test for my sandbox

User:KaelaAudrey/sandbox