User:Gracegjerde/Squat lobsters/Gracegjerde Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Julie Vu - Description


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Squat lobster


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Squat lobster

Evaluate the drafted changes
Overall Impression:

Content added improved quality of article...by adding a source and increasing morphological description the reader has a better idea of squat lobster morphology (aka more complete)

Strengths:

Very clear, relevant, and thorough information about squat lobster morphology

Good peer-reviewed source added

Further improvements:

"The two main groups of squat lobsters share most features of their morphology. " ...I would explicitly state the two main groups of squat lobsters and say "are morphologically similar" to make the sentence more concise.

The paragraphs are broken up well, but the page is very detailed...maybe consider if all the morphology is relevant to the reader

Also, could add another source to make section more reputable