User:Gracelyn 36/sandbox

Wikipedia Work Cited

Yeri Cho, and Nathanael J. Fast. “Lacking Status Hinders Prosocial Behavior among the Powerful.” Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, vol. 46, no. 9, Oct. 2018, pp. 1547–1560. EBSCOhost, doi:10.2224/sbp.6150.

Moradi, Saleh, et al. “Flourishing and Prosocial Behaviors: A Multilevel Investigation of National Corruption Level as a Moderator.” PLoS ONE, vol. 13, no. 7, July 2018, pp. 1–25. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0200062.

Futamura, Ikumi. “Is Extraordinary Prosocial Behavior More Valuable than Ordinary Prosocial Behavior?” PLoS ONE, vol. 13, no. 3, Apr. 2018, pp. 1–14. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0196340

Erlandsson, Arvid, et al. “Bullshit-Sensitivity Predicts Prosocial Behavior.” PLoS ONE, vol. 13,

no. 8, July    2018, pp. 1–12. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0201474.

===You've got some really good sources listed here. Read them enough to find information that helps fill content gaps in the WP article. Then you'll need to think about how best to integrate this information by introducing it and explaining its significance (think sandwich). That will require adding more specific text. Complete draft is due by March 11. JAirhart 16:18, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Draft

Prosocial behavior helps many beneficial functions by bettering production of any league and it's organizational scales. Cognitive capacities like intelligence for example, are almost always related to prosocial likings. The correlation between a helper's state and helping tendencies are greatly restricted to the relationship between whomever takes part in the situation. There are two different forms of prosocial behaviors. Ordinary prosocial behavior requires, "situational and sociocultural demands." Extraordinary prosocial behavior doesn't include as much. This indicates that one form is used for a more selfish result while the other is not.