User:Graciekass1101/Cheongsam/Kendyldelyse Peer Review

General info
Graciekass110
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Graciekass1101/Cheongsam
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Cheongsam

Lead

 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? I think so
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Yes
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It is concise

Content

 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes it explores the cultural appropriation of the dress
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? The article explores cultural appropriation of Cheongsam which is not often talked about.

Tone and Balance

 * Is the content added neutral? Yes all of the information included is factual
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No its neutral
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No its neutral

Sources and References

 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes, all sources are credible
 * Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.) Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes two of them specifically talk about the Cheongsam and one of them refers to the movie that was mentioned
 * Are the sources current? Yes they were published with the last few years except for the second source but that is alright because it refers to a movie from the 90s
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Yes one of the articles authors is an Asian American woman
 * Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.) The current sources match greatly with the topic of the article
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes

Images and Media

 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Yes
 * Are images well-captioned? Yes, the caption states where the image is from and who is in it.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yes
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Yes, it's in a standard Wikipedia format

Overall impressions

 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? The content has improved the quality of the article because it adds a deeper insight into the controversy of the Cheongsam
 * What are the strengths of the content added? It includes up to date information about the western culture appropriation of the dress which is an important topic to talk about
 * How can the content added be improved? I would say to just add more sources