User:Grafikm fr/Arbcom

Disruption history
As the ArbCom is probably aware of, Digwuren has a lengthy record of blocks made by several admins for various disruptions. Since last block, User:Deskana unblocked Digwuren stating explicitely that "having consulted blocking admin, this user is unblocked to participate in RFC and/or mediation cases ONLY. reblock if user abuses this trust."

Obviously, Digwuren's disruptive attitude did not end with that unblock.

Edit warrying and POV Pushing
Digwuren's attitude was extremely disruptive on a number of pages, where he engaged in heavy edit warrying. Examples include:


 * Monument of Lihula - edit warrying leading to a block (see block log):
 * 
 * 


 * Anti-Estonian sentiment (now named Estonia-Russia relations). Digwuren again engaged in heavy edit warrying that led to yet another block:
 * 
 * - with an offensive edit summary to boot
 * 


 * Lennart Meri - edit warrying to keep a POV phrase "non-communist style" election. Such a phrase is obviously inflammatory and far better alternatives are possible but he kept reverting it.
 * 
 * after another editor tries to NPOV it.


 * Jüri Uluots reverting almost the same stuff over and over in an attempt to POV it:
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 


 * Soviet occupation - stopping 1 edit short of 3RR:
 * 
 * 
 * 


 * Lydia Koidula
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * edit made 26h after those 3 - how curious...
 * and here we go again


 * Rein Lang - edit warrying:
 * removing referenced content
 * and again
 * and again

Also note heavy edit warrying by User:Alexia Death in the same article.
 * Congress of Estonia
 * removing POV tags without consensus
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * and calling other editor's actions "vandalism" to boot.
 * 


 * Bronze Soldier of Tallinn - here examples are so numerous that I'll only provide a selection of those:
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 

There are many more diffs from this page but they're too many to list them all
 * Soviet occupation of Romania - removing POV tag without consensus:
 * - calling others' edits "vandalism" again
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 


 * Einsatzgruppe A
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 

Basically, what he's trying to do is to bully other editors to make them stay out of "his" articles so he can plague them with POV pushing. These edits are only a sample (albeit a representative one) of his warrying.

Sander Sade
Calling other user's edits "vandalism":
 *