User:Grahamo3/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Andy Schor.)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I was curious to learn more information on the mayor of Lansing. In addition to this I wanted to be able to compare the article to other mayor wikipedia pages. The article matters because it is most likely a frequently looked at page for outsiders but more importantly to the Lansing community looking to know about the history and contributions of people that ran their community. My preliminary impression of Andy Shor's page was that it does not have much content compared to other articles I have skimmed over.

Evaluate the article
The lead section that included the introductory section was clear, concise, and perfectly describes what the article is about. Regarding the content, sources, and tone although the article is neutral the earliest source is from 2020 and the rest are completely outdated which could mean that there is missing information. The content and sources presented do not have any underrepresented/minority population viewpoints or statistics. From the little information in the article there were no grammatical errors but the wording was not fluid. Overall the article does not have many strengths besides the introduction and lack of grammatical errors. The article could be improved by adding more current and more diverse resources. There should also be a more in-depth analysis that includes underrepresented viewpoints in order to add more content and make it a more developed paper.