User:Grantloseke/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * Uffizi


 * Article Evaluation
 * Lead Section
 * The lead section is good, it explains what the Uffizi musem is all about.
 * Content
 * The content is pretty relevant. It explains the history of the museum through modern times.
 * Tone and Balance
 * Article is neutral, as nothing is biased.
 * Sources and References
 * Sources are reliable, current, and relevant.
 * Organization and writing quality
 * Article is concise and each section explains each part of history.
 * Images and Media
 * The images display the main features of the museum
 * Talk Page Discussion
 * Rated C-class, talks on different features.
 * Overall Impressions
 * Article is pretty good. It can be improved by explaining how the Uffizi was constructed.


 * Sources
 * Not all sources can be copied over
 * The Art Newspaper List of Most Visited Art Museums, March 28,2022
 * ^ Flores, Lourdes (19 August 2015). "Eike Schmidt nuovo direttore della Galleria degli Uffizi" [Eike Schmidt new director of the Uffizi Gallery]. VisitUffizi.org (in Italian).
 * ^
 * ^
 * ^
 * ^
 * ^ Sigfried Giedion, Space, Time and Architecture (1941) 1962 fig.17.
 * ^
 * ^ Jump up to:a b
 * ^
 * ^
 * ^
 * ^
 * ^ Jump up to:a b
 * ^
 * ^
 * ^ "The Art Newspaper", 30 march 2021
 * ^
 * ^

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Florence Cathedral


 * Article Evaluation
 * Lead Section
 * The lead section is detailed, explaining what the church is all about
 * Content
 * The content is relevant, avoiding equity gaps. It contiains the details on the church.
 * Tone and Balance
 * The article has a neutral tone
 * Sources and References
 * All the information is backed up by thorough, current sources.
 * Organization and writing quality
 * The article is well organized, but is very detailed.
 * Images and Media
 * The images explain the features of the cathedral, and is captioned well.
 * Talk Page Discussion
 * Rated C-class, mainly discusses on the name of the cathedral
 * Overall Impressions
 * This article is very good and detailed, and well-developed


 * Sources
 * Not all sources can be copied over
 * ^ Bartlett, pp. 36–37; according to Bartlett, the people of Florence continued to call the cathedral by its former name for some time after reconstruction.
 * ^
 * ^ Jump up to:a b Barlett, 36.
 * ^
 * ^
 * ^
 * ^
 * ^
 * ^ King, pp. 76–79.
 * ^
 * ^ Charles Seymour, Jr. "Homo Magnus et Albus: the Quattrocento Background for Michelangelo's David of 1501–04," Stil und Überlieferung in der Kunst des Abendlandes, Berlin, 1967, II, 96–105.
 * ^ Janson, pp. 3–7
 * ^ Pope-Hennessey, John (1958) Italian Renaissance Sculpture, London, pp. 6–7
 * ^ Poeschke, p. 27.
 * ^ Seymour, 100–101.
 * ^ King, p. 10
 * ^ Jump up to:a b
 * ^ King, p. 9.
 * ^ King, p. 7.
 * ^ Lancaster, Lynne (2005) Concrete Vaulted Construction in Imperial Rome: Innovations in Context, Cambridge University Press, p. 44
 * ^ For a fictional impression see PBS' The Medici: Godfathers of the Renaissance, Birth of a Dynasty (on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9FFDJK8jmms Archived 23 January 2017 at the Wayback Machine at the 20:15 mark)
 * ^ Stevenson, Niel (2007) Architecture Explained. ISBN 0756628687. pp. 36–37.
 * ^ King, pp. 70–73.
 * ^ King, p. 97.
 * ^
 * ^
 * ^
 * ^ King, pp. 105–107.
 * ^ Gartner, Peter, Filippo Brunelleschi 1377–1446, p 95.
 * ^ King, p. 69.
 * ^ Paolo Galluzzi, "Leonard de Vinci, engineer and architect", p. 50
 * ^ Figures vary. archINFORM Archived 20 June 2021 at the Wayback Machine gives a 45 m wide tambour, while Santa Maria del Fiore at Structurae gives a 43 m diameter of the cupola, others as little as 42 m.
 * ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f
 * ^ Jump up to:a b c d e
 * ^ As referenced in "Cupola di Santa Maria del Fiore: il cantiere di restauro 1980–1995" by Cristina Acidini Luchinat and Riccardo Dalla Negra published by Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato (Roma) in 1995 (ISBN 8824039561)
 * ^ Thesaurus Florentinus project page (in Italian) Archived 17 May 2021 at the Wayback Machine, Soprintendenza ai Beni Architettonici e Paesaggisitici di Firenze, Ministero dei Beni Culturali
 * ^
 * ^
 * ^ Jump up to:a b
 * ^ Jump up to:a b c d e
 * ^ Jump up to:a b
 * ^ Jump up to:a b c
 * ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h
 * ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f
 * ^ Jump up to:a b c d
 * ^
 * ^
 * ^
 * ^

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Santa Maria Gloriosa dei Frari


 * Article Evaluation
 * Lead Section
 * The lead is concise and explains what the church is all about.
 * Content
 * The content is related. It talks about the history, the different pipe organs, works of art and the inside floor plan, and funeral monuments
 * Tone and Balance
 * The article is neutral, having no controversies.
 * Sources and References
 * There are no sources, and no citations from other sources
 * Organization and writing quality
 * This article is concise and easy to read, and the content is well organized
 * Images and Media
 * The images understand the topic, as it labels each work of art and funeral monument within the church
 * Talk Page Discussion
 * S-class article, and talks about the error of not including one of the funeral monuments
 * Overall Impressions
 * The article is pretty good, it can be improved by citing the sources and referencing them


 * Sources
 * There are no sources

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Schonbrunn Palace


 * Article Evaluation
 * Lead Section
 * The lead section describes the palace, including all the features of the palace.
 * Content
 * The content was too brief. It talks about the history, gardens, and other activitites, but not the interior of the palace.
 * Tone and Balance
 * The tone is pretty neutral without showing controversey.
 * Sources and References
 * Some, but not all facts are cited correctly. Some sections of the gardens does not have the source cited.
 * Organization and writing quality
 * The article is organized and well written, but it does not have enough content.
 * Images and Media
 * The images are well captioned, and it shows the exterior and the gardens of the palace.
 * Talk Page Discussion
 * S-class, talks about content that was removed or moved, including the garden's sculptures, and the zoo that came within the palace.
 * Overall Impressions
 * This article needs to be improved. It can be improved by citing more sources on areas that did not get cited, and also explaining the inside of the palace.


 * Sources
 * Not all sources can be copied over.
 * Official website
 * ^
 * ^
 * ^
 * ^
 * ^
 * ^ Schönbrunn ist Wiens beliebteste Sehenswürdigkeit (in German). Die Presse, 4 August 2010. Retrieved 15 August 2010.
 * ^
 * ^ http://www.jamesbondmm.co.uk/locations/schonbrunn-palace [full citation needed]
 * ^
 * ^

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Pazzi Chapel


 * Article Evaluation
 * Lead Section
 * The lead section is concise, but not enough information
 * Content
 * The content is too brief. It only explains the history.
 * Tone and Balance
 * The article is neutral, as far as not being controversial.
 * Sources and References
 * Although, the content is brief, the content is cited with sources very well.
 * Organization and writing quality
 * The article does not have enough content, and is not orgainized, because everything is all in one section.
 * Images and Media
 * There are some well-captioned images, describing the interior.
 * Talk Page DiscussionS-class, there is no discussion at the moment
 * Overall Impressions
 * This article needs to be improved big time, and it can be improved by putting more detail on the building beyond the history.


 * Sources
 * Not all sources can be copied over.
 * ^
 * ^
 * ^ Trachtenberg, p. 62
 * ^
 * ^ Eugenio Battisti. Filippo Brunelleschi: The Complete Work. (New York: Rizzoli, 1981) *See also: Howard Saalman. Filippo Brunelleschi: The Buildings. (London: Zwemmer, 1993).
 * ^
 * ^
 * ^ Della Robbia, Luca. Encyclopædia Britannica. 2007.
 * ^ Della Robbia, Luca. Encyclopædia Britannica. 2007.