User:Gravycajun/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Cerberus

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose the article of Cerberus because it caught my attention and seemed interesting. I've heard Cerberus used often in pop culture, so it sounded familiar when I came across it. My preliminary impressions of it were that it was well written, full of information and had plenty of sources cited throughout.

Evaluate the article
The lead concisely describes the articles contents, but it is not overly detailed. I'd say the content of this article is all relevant and equally distributed. There isn't too many unnecessary details or topics. The information is neutral and doesn't seem biased. Considering symbols in mythology can have many different origins or stories attached to them, the author did a good job by covering many of the interpretations of Cerberus. The article has an abundance of sources listed throughout as well as cited at the bottom. The links that I did check worked and brought me to the corresponding article/site. There are a few images in the article with adequate descriptions and captions. Since I'm a visual learner, I would've liked to see more pictures, but that is just personal preference. I think all-in-all it is a better article than I could ever write. I think mythology is a hard topic to tackle when it comes to organizing certain things, since there can be so many conflicting accounts regarding stories, symbols, origins, etc. This is a very strong article, in my opinion.