User:GreenPanda55/Magdalena Suarez Frimkess/Cubanartist6401 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Greenpanda55

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewingMagdalena Suarez Frimkess - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.) The leading question is concise and well formatted. All citations and footnotes are in place as outlined in course guidelines. The language used within the article was neutral and seemed to follow the topic being covered. All sources were well documented, and links all seemed to open and work. Overall, the article appeared well written and topic transitions seemed smooth and appropriate.