User:Green glitter/Digital rhetoric/Klcarver Peer Review

Although there are still many areas where this article could benefit from editing, the copy edits you made make the selection much easier to read. I think the content is relevant and current. There don't appear to be any changes made which violate Wikipedia policies or share a biased opinion. The content actually appears more clear and neutral than the original version. I like the way it is broken down into sections to keep each topic separated and simpler to digest.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)