User:Greengiraffe123/Commodity plastics/Emeraldwoozy Peer Review

The Lead does include an introductory sentence but unclear if it has been updated to reflect any new content added. The Lead could odder more of a description on the body of information that follows. The body could also be broken down into more concise sections. The Lead is concise and offers information that is later discussed in the article. The content is relevant to the topic, but could be more up to date. More information can be added to create sections, such as history, or environmental concern. The content in the article is neutral and non-biased. There is no persuasion taking place the article is informational with no particular viewpoint. There are secondary sources to back up the information in the article. The sources look credible and full of good information. The content is well written but I do think there should be more organized sections in the body paragraph that you can then expand on further. There are no images that would be a good thing to consider adding to enhance the work. I think the content in the article is informative but there could be more added, for example statistics related to the statistics of plastic use or the benefits and dangers of using different plastics. I would say the most important thing you should do is add more sections to your body paragraph to provide more information on the topic.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)