User:Greengiraffe123/Commodity plastics/Mbrighton3 Peer Review

Everything in the article is related to the topic and keeps the focus throughout the article. The references are good and the links work.

I think the main thing for me is i'm unsure what the point of the article is. Is the article just trying to tell us what the commodity plastics are or is there a deeper meaning and hope that readers will get out of the article. I think it does a great job of giving a brief description of what they are and some examples, but I want to know what I should care about them. There are some grammatical errors within the article as well, but that's just a simple glance over mistake. The article body section to me should have more information about the issue, if there even is an issue with them.

Based on the peer review checklist, it seems like the article is headed in the right direction. I think it would be interesting to know what the next step is for the article. I would start by organizing the article with headings letting the reader know the importance of the article.