User:Greer365/James V. Neel/Madisonyuying Peer Review

There were a total of three edits from two different authors. The overall topic of the edits was of the life of James Neel. These edits were shown, but there was only one real edit that added anything. The content added was nice neutral content, but it was a bit more heavy on his life rather than his works. This is not a negative it is just the nature of the edit.

This is good neutral content added to the article. I feel that the information added is a good addition to the article, but could possibly be more robust.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)