User:Greg Glover/sandbox


 * ADDED: If your into math as I am. You could add another column with $$\delta^n$$ for the rate of infection based on your numbers and a 21 day cycle. Hence: 22 MAR at 49 case to 12 APR (actually 11 APR) at 184 is $$\delta^n$$ = 3.76; to 03 MAY 244, $$\delta^n$$ = 1.33; to 24 MAY 270 (actually 23 MAY), $$\delta^n$$ = 1.15; to 14 JUN 522, $$\delta^n$$ = 1.93; to 05 JUL 844 (actually 06 JUL), $$\delta^n$$ = 1.61; to 26 JUL 1323 (actually 27 JUL), $$\delta^n$$ = 1.56; to 16 AUG 2240, $$\delta^n$$ = 1.69; to 06 SEP 4366 (actually 07 SEP), $$\delta^n$$ = 1.95; to 27 SEP 6574 (actually 23 SEP), $$\delta^n$$ = 1.5


 * This shows to those that understand the math the progression based on WHO projections. Seems there is a projection of 21,000 cases by 01 NOV. Based on a 21 day cycle at the last $$\delta^n$$ of 1.5. The projection could be 16435 cases. Not to far the WHO projection made in late August.

Not to throw a monkey wrench into your edits. But what you are proposing is found here in the Ebola virus disease article. Why do we need it repeated in the this article?